Legislature(2013 - 2014)BARNES 124
03/26/2013 01:30 PM House TRANSPORTATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB176 | |
| HJR13 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 13 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 176 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE TRANSPORTATION STANDING COMMITTEE
March 26, 2013
2:11 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Peggy Wilson, Chair
Representative Doug Isaacson, Vice Chair
Representative Eric Feige
Representative Lynn Gattis
Representative Bob Lynn
Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Craig Johnson
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 176
"An Act relating to experimental vehicles."
- MOVED CSHB 176(TRA) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 13
Urging the United States Congress and the President of the
United States to complete the funding and acquisition of three
additional National Security Cutters and to home port one of the
cutters in Kodiak, Alaska.
- MOVED CSHJR 13(TRA) OUT OF COMMITTEE
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 176
SHORT TITLE: EXPERIMENTAL VEHICLE PLATES
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) THOMPSON
03/18/13 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/18/13 (H) TRA, FIN
03/26/13 (H) TRA AT 1:30 PM BARNES 124
BILL: HJR 13
SHORT TITLE: COAST GUARD NAT'L SECURITY CUTTER FUNDING
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) AUSTERMAN
03/15/13 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/15/13 (H) TRA
03/26/13 (H) TRA AT 1:30 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the discussion of HB 176.
JANE PIERSON, Staff
Representative Steve Thompson
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented the bill on behalf of
Representative Steve Thompson, sponsor of HB 176.
SHELLY MELLOT, Deputy Director
Director's Office
Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
Department of Administration (DOA)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified and answered questions on HB 176.
ALLISON EARHART, Attorney
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (VWGoA)
Herndon, Virginia
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the discussion of HB 176.
JIM DODSON, President
Fairbanks Economic Development Corporation (FEDC)
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 176.
JULIE EMSLIE, Project Manager
Cold-weather Testing
Fairbanks Economic Development Corporation (FEDC) Fairbanks
Economic Development Corporation (FEDC)
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 176.
MELANIE LESH, Staff
Representative Alan Austerman
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the presentation of HJR
13.
CARL UCHYTIL Captain, Retired
U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HJR 13.
ED PAGE, Captain, Retired
U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during the discussion of HJR 13.
ACTION NARRATIVE
2:11:02 PM
CHAIR PEGGY WILSON called the House Transportation Standing
Committee meeting to order at 2:11 p.m. Representatives
Isaacson, Gattis, Kreiss-Tomkins, and P. Wilson were present at
the call to order. Representatives Feige and Lynn arrived as
the meeting was in progress.
HB 176-EXPERIMENTAL VEHICLE PLATES
2:11:42 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 176, "An Act relating to experimental
vehicles."
2:12:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 176, Version U [labeled 28-LS0674\U,
Strasbaugh, 3/18/13] as the working document. [Version U was
before the committee.
2:12:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON, Alaska State Legislature,
speaking as sponsor of HB 176, stated that this bill is badly
needed in the state. He recalled that about 10 years ago, while
he was mayor in Fairbanks, he was trying to get a test track for
winter testing of manufacturers of vehicles. He discovered
large numbers of worldwide car manufacturers were using Interior
Alaska for cold-weather testing, although most people did not
know the testing was occurring since the cars were disguised.
He characterized auto manufacturer's testing as a pretty good
sized industry. He reported three people in Fairbanks told him
they test drive every winter in Fairbanks for different
manufacturers. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (VWGoA)
brought up test vehicles last winter, but needed to re-test and
VWGoA the DMV indicated the vehicles would need to be titled and
licensed since temporary licenses were not available for test
vehicles. This bill would authorize license plates for up to 36
months to allow winter testing programs to occur. He offered
his belief that the test driving is an important economic
development driver that uses local mechanics, garages,
warehouses, and drivers.
2:15:21 PM
JANE PIERSON, Staff, Representative Steve Thompson, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of the sponsor, Representative Steve
Thompson, stated this bill would give statutory authority for
experimental vehicle plates to be issued by the Division of
Motor Vehicles (DMV) to manufacturers or distributors for a 12-
month period, with the ability for the license to be renewed for
additional 12-month periods, for a maximum of 36 months. She
clarified that this authority will be restricted to
manufacturing or distributors and not just an individual who has
built an experimental vehicle in a garage. When the vehicles
leave Alaska they are relocated or destroyed since these
vehicles cannot be titled due to their experimental nature. The
bill would amend AS 28.10.181 related to registration of unique
and special vehicles to be used for special purposes, and would
create a special license plate the purposes of cold-weather
experimental vehicles. She reiterated that this is a good
economic driver for Interior Alaska.
2:17:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN asked whether other type of testing can be
done.
MS. PIERSON answered that according to DMV currently there isn't
any other testing is going on in Alaska. She deferred to the
department to expand on this.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN said perhaps other types of testing should
be happening.
MS. PIERSON answered that the sponsor would not have any problem
with expanding the scope of the bill; however, she would like
DMV to respond in case it raises any issues for the department.
2:18:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON offered his support for HB 176. He
understood that Minnesota is the only other state currently
offering cold-weather testing. He reported that Minnesota
charges $50 for first four license plates and $35 for each one
thereafter. The plates expire each December 31 without any
prorated fees. He asked for a comparison in DMV's fees in
Minnesota and Alaska.
2:19:54 PM
SHELLY MELLOT, Deputy Director, Director's Office, Division of
Motor Vehicles (DMV), Department of Administration (DOA), stated
that DMV currently charges $90 for annual registration fees
since the fees fall under commercial vehicle rates. In response
to Representative Lynn's previous question, she said the
department did not have any issue with going beyond cold-weather
testing. The DMV has visited the facility and currently the
testing is limited to cold-weather testing; however, the
department does not have an issue with removing cold-weather
from the bill.
2:20:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON asked whether the $90 covers a three
year period per vehicle.
MS. MELLOT answered the fee is every 12 months.
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON understood that Alaska's DMV fees would
be higher than the ones Minnesota charges. He asked whether the
DMV sets the fee structure.
MS. MELLOT indicated the legislature sets the fees under AS
28.10.421, noting these vehicles are considered commercial
vehicles.
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON asked whether a special category such as
a vehicle testing category could be done in this bill.
2:22:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON asked for clarification on the effect
of removing "cold-weather" and whether that would allow the
department to be more flexible with respect to experimental
vehicle testing.
MS. MELLOT answered yes; that the change would be more flexible.
2:22:42 PM
ALLISON EARHART, Attorney, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
(VWGoA) stated that VWGoA is the parent company of the
Volkswagen operations in the U.S. She offered VWGoA's support
for this bill. She stated she is an in-house attorney for VWGOA
and she specializes in licensing matters. She offered that HB
176 would allow VWGoA to continue to perform its cold-weather
testing in Alaska. She summarized that VWGoA typically tests
its vehicles in Alaska and apply for a one-year registration in
order to do so; however, with more stringent EPA standards it
has become necessary to bring the vehicles back for subsequent
years for additional testing; however, the DMV does not have any
provision available to allow for additional testing in
subsequent years.
2:24:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON understood this bill would be adequate,
but perhaps removing "cold-weather" would allow other
experimental vehicle testing; however, perhaps the committee
should not worry about adjusting fees at this time. He asked
whether this would be adequate to keep VWGoA in business in
Alaska.
MS. EARHART answered yes.
2:24:47 PM
JIM DODSON, President, Fairbanks Economic Development
Corporation (FEDC) stated that FEDC has been promoting cold-
weather testing for more than 20 years. He characterized it as
a growing industry that creates jobs and helps to diversify the
economy in Interior Alaska and in the state. He reported the
FEDC has partnered with the City of Valdez and the community of
Big Delta to attract the cold-weather automotive industry in
Alaska to do their cold-weather testing. Today at least four
car manufacturers have been performing cold-weather testing in
Fairbanks. The FEDC has advertised Fairbanks as the most
accessible, reliable, and affordable place in the nation to do
cold-weather testing. This industry creates more than 200 jobs
annually in Fairbanks and it is a growing industry. In fact, it
represents an industry that the state has not had to invest
money to attract. The state has the natural weather to attract
cold-weather testing. He urged members to support HB 176 as it
is rewritten.
2:26:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS asked whether Fairbanks is the least
expensive place in the nation to do the testing.
MR. DODSON answered that one factor is the accessibility and
reliability of cold-weather. For example, a manufacturer may go
to Minnesota to perform tests, but if cold-weather doesn't
materialize, the company has lost the opportunity to conduct
testing.
CHAIR P. WILSON remarked she lived in Tok for four years and she
recalled experiencing 78 below zero degree weather without a
wind-chill factor.
2:27:22 PM
JULIE EMSLIE, Project Manager, Cold-weather Testing, Fairbanks
Economic Development Corporation (FEDC) Fairbanks Economic
Development Corporation (FEDC), stated that everyone thinks of
Alaska, especially Interior Alaska, as being cold. She said
that Interior Alaska experiences consistent cold-weather
conditions which are difficult to find anywhere else in the
world. She explained that the weather, combined with the
facilities and vibrant service industry has become a prime
location for companies to cold-weather test its products. This
testing brings significant, positive impacts to the community of
Fairbanks. She estimated that cold-weather testing generates
$500 million annually for the local economy. She pointed out
that the automotive testing industry heavily utilizes Interior
Alaska for cold-weather testing. In fact, it was recently
brought to the FEDC's attention that some of the local
automotive testing companies have encountered issues with
Alaska's current vehicle titling and registration regulations.
As previously stated, this has largely becoming problematic due
to changes in federal regulations on emissions. She said that
Alaska's current laws are incompatible with what the car testing
companies need to do to perform their work. She offered her
belief that HB 176 offers a solution to this problem and the
bill would remove the barrier to automotive testing, but will
also not infringe on the DMV's mission, as well.
2:29:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN asked whether the cold-weather testing will
change emission systems and if any provision allows for
experimental types of emission systems. In response to a
question, he repeated his question and clarified that one
emission system may perform better in the cold than others. He
wondered if an alternative system might run afoul of emissions
testing in Alaska, although he acknowledged he was uncertain
about emissions.
MS. MELLOT answered that she is not aware of all the types of
testing being done. She recalled that part of the reason to
perform testing beyond 12 months was due to the requirement by
the EPA for longer periods of emissions testing.
CHAIR P. WILSON pointed out she is somewhat familiar, recalling
it has something to do with the types of gasoline used. She
further recalled Alaska has been working on a [federal]
exemption. She suggested that it might be necessary to revisit
[emissions].
2:31:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS wondered how Fairbanks was
partnering with Valdez on cold-weather testing.
MS. EMSLIE answered it relates to snow levels since Valdez
receives lots of snow whereas Fairbanks does not so Fairbanks
has partnered with Valdez to accommodate all of the cold-weather
testing needs. She stated that [Valdez] has also attended trade
shows and the FEDC can also refer companies to Valdez who are
primarily interested in testing vehicles [in snow conditions].
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS was curious if any other ways
exist to make Alaska's bad weather economical.
2:32:57 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON, after first determining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 176.
2:33:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON made a motion to adopt Conceptual
Amendment 1, to remove "cold-weather" on page 1, lines 6, 7, and
11 of HB 176.
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE objected for purpose of discussion.
CHAIR P. WILSON recapped the reason for Conceptual Amendment 1,
which is to expand the bill to allow for additional vehicle
testing. She advised that the DMV and the VWGoA did not
anticipate any issues arising by taking out "cold-weather."
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE removed his objection.
There being no further objection, Conceptual Amendment 1 was
adopted.
2:34:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON moved to report the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 176, labeled [28-LS0674\U, Strasbaugh,
3/18/13], as amended, out of committee with individual
recommendations and the accompanying zero fiscal note. There
being no further objection, the CSHB 176(TRA) was reported from
the House Transportation Standing Committee.
The committee took a brief at-ease.
HJR 13-COAST GUARD NAT'L SECURITY CUTTER FUNDING
2:35:00 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 13, Urging the United States
Congress and the President of the United States to complete the
funding and acquisition of three additional National Security
Cutters and to home port one of the cutters in Kodiak, Alaska.
2:37:12 PM
MELANIE LESH, Staff, Representative Alan Austerman, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of the sponsor, stated that HJR 13 would
urge the U.S. Congress and the President of the U.S. to complete
the funding and acquisition of three additional National
Security Cutters (NSCs) and request one of the cutters should be
homeported in Kodiak. She explained HJR 13 aims to raise
awareness that the U.S. Coast Guard is in the process of
replacing 12 high-endurance cutters with eight technologically
advanced NSCs and stressing the necessity to deliver all eight
vessels. The sponsor wishes to highlight the strategic
importance of Alaska in the region and focus on the importance
of the increasing role in the Arctic with more open water in the
summer resulting in increased maritime traffic. She stated that
Kodiak is the nearest USCG port and would be the base of
operations for vessels such as the Bertholf, which is one of the
three completed NSCs which patrolled the Arctic this past summer
in Operation Arctic Shield. She related that the USCG assists
the U.S. Department of Defense's national defense efforts with
its specialized capabilities in the region and elsewhere.
2:39:07 PM
MS. LESH said that recently, at a national military conference
the three chiefs met to discuss the maritime strategic issues,
including the Commandant of the USCG, Admiral Robert Papp; the
Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps, General James Amos; and the
Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jonathan Greenert. The main
topic of discussion was the Commander-in-Chief's strategic
guidance which, in part, requires that the U.S. military will,
of necessity rebalance towards the Asia-Pacific region. In
conclusion, HJR 13 has been designed to send a reminder to the
Congress and the U.S. President to complete the program of
record for the funding and acquisition of three additional NSCs
cutters. She recognized two retired U.S.C.G. captains in the
room here to testify on the resolution.
2:40:22 PM
CARL UCHYTIL, Captain, Retired, U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), stated
that he is a retired USCG captain who sailed in Alaska's waters
and served as the commanding officer of the icebreaker Polar
Sea. He commended the committee and said he wholly supports the
committee for taking action to encourage the federal government
and Department of Homeland Security to maintain a NSC presence
in Alaska. Having an NSC specifically homeported in Alaska
would not only provide a multi-missioned platform to serve the
coastal communities in times of need, but perhaps more
importantly, would build mission capacity for the Alaskan
resident crew to better understand the unique challenges faced
by mariners sailing in the Bering Sea and the Gulf of Alaska.
He thanked members for their support for the USCG in Alaska.
2:41:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON asked whether three NSCs would provide
enough support and if one NSC will provide enough coverage in
Alaska.
CAPTAIN UCHYTIL stated one liberty he has as a retired Captain,
he cannot speak on behalf of the USCG's needs, but he can speak
frankly and provide his opinion based upon his three decades of
service in the USCG. Certainly, Alaska has 3,300 miles of
coastline. Thus, to adequately cover Alaska would require more
than three NSCs, he said.
2:42:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON realized that the resolution does not
empower any demand since it is not an executive order. He
recalled Captain Uchytil is a retired ice breaker captain.
CAPTAIN UCHYTIL answered yes; that he served half of his time on
icebreakers. He understood the resolution has to do with NSCs
so if this were a different venue he would tout the needs of the
nation and encouraged Alaska to build and sustain a viable
icebreaker fleet.
2:43:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON asked whether it is feasible to support
an icebreaker homeport in Alaska.
CAPTAIN UCHYTIL stated that the NSCs have very high technical,
high-demand shore side needs to meet the requirements of the
crew, which doesn't mean it couldn't be built in a port such as
Kodiak, but it probably does not yet exist to really maintain
the NSC. Similarly, staff and technical support to maintain the
icebreakers would need to be developed.
2:45:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON asked for clarification on whether he is
saying Alaska does not currently have the technical expertise
for the NSC.
CAPTAIN UCHYTIL answered that the expertise could be built but
it does not currently exist.
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON suggested that passage of the resolution
would encourage the build out.
2:45:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE said HJR 13's supporting documents indicate
that the NSC is a legend class of the USCG's fleet. He asked
what vessels are currently based in Kodiak.
MR. UCITEL answered that the USCG's cutter Munro is a 378 foot
high-endurance cutter, which are part of a class of 12 cutters
built in the 1960s or 1970s. The USCG has been in the process
of decommissioning these 12 vessels and will replace then with
the eight NSCs. He said that only five of the eight NSCs have
been funded so part of this resolution is to encourage the
federal government to build the remaining three vessels. He
remarked that his son is currently assigned to the Munro in
Kodiak.
2:46:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN asked why not include the Under Secretary of
the Treasury and the U.S. President among those receiving a copy
of the resolution.
CAPTAIN UCHYTIL answered that the USCG falls under the
Department of Homeland Security; that at one point the USCG was
under the U.S Department of the Treasury, then U.S. Department
of Transportation, and now falls under the jurisdiction of the
Department of Homeland Security.
2:47:27 PM
ED PAGE, Captain, Retired, U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), stated that
he served in the U.S. Coast Guard for 30 years. He said he
served on the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Boutwell in 1973 in
Alaska. He appreciated the resolution, noting he has been
retired for 12 years, but served in Anchorage, Ketchikan, and
Juneau. The USCG feels appreciated by Alaskans, which makes
sense since Alaska is a maritime state. He characterized the
USCG's relationship as being a symbiotic and good relationship
with the state. He applauded the legislature's efforts to work
to obtain the presence of more USCG cutters. He pointed out his
perspective is different from Captain Uchytil's perspective
since he served on USCG cutters for many years in Alaska. He
pointed out his work has been in the field of marine safety
programs, relating he was the Chief of Marine Safety for the
Pacific Area and for Alaska. He explained that he was involved
in allocating cutters and enforcement oversight in fisheries.
Clearly, the enormity of Alaska makes the challenge even greater
and exacerbating that problem is the growing body of water due
to the environmental warming and climate change. Additionally,
Alaska has more traffic and more activity with offshore
exploration. He explained he was on some of the drilling
platforms in 1984 when they initially performed exploratory
drilling in the Chukchi Sea, but things have changed
substantially since then. He said the USCG's presence is
important, just as having policemen on the highway deters
motorists from speeding.
2:49:57 PM
CAPTAIN PAGE said that the USCG's presence and monitoring is
important, but when something happens the USCG will provide an
effective response to help prevent loss of life, property, and
environmental harm. Thus it seems logical that with the opening
up of more water in Alaska, the USCG must have more USCG
cutters. In fact, it is one of the metrics used to determine
where cutters should go and how to allocate them. He emphasized
the USCG considers the size, the issues, how important the
issues are in determining the USCG's role. Certainly,
considering the reconnoitering Alaska's waters [the USCG has
discovered] other nations, such as China, have a great interest
in tapping Alaska resources just offshore.
2:51:07 PM
CAPTAIN PAGE anticipated it could happen that the U.S. will
extend its borders further, which could increase the USCG's
jurisdictional areas. He emphasized that the USCG is the right
agency and resource to carry this mission out. He offered his
support for HJR 13, which he said is appropriate, needed, and
timely. He offered his belief that Alaska also impacts the rest
of the nation, in particular, Alaska's resources has national
ramifications. The fisheries, resource protection, and oil
production development are all national issues, he said. He
offered his belief that people in Maine, Boston and New York are
paying attention and the USCG is best suited to ensure it is
done.
2:52:26 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON asked him to assess how many ships Alaska needs
[for adequate coverage of Alaska's waters].
CAPTAIN PAGE replied that with more vessels sailing in the
Alaska's waters enroute to the Far East, and with more vessels
using the Northern sea route and the Northwest passage that even
with three [vessels] the fleet will be stretched for resources.
He pointed out these ships typically have six months of
maintenance annually and servicing. He concluded that the
proposed three vessels represent a good presence and is
realistic in terms of the nation's status and resources.
2:53:59 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON said that Kodiak is a long way from the Bering
Sea. She wondered if Alaska will need another port that is
better situated for impacts in the arctic.
CAPTAIN PAGE answered that the real challenge will be to support
the vessels, which is why the USCG likes to comingle vessels,
which helps provide technical support to maintain the vessel.
He suggested that spreading them out is less effective. As a
practical matter, due to the speed of vessels, a vessel is only
24 hours away from any point.
2:55:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS pointed out that three NSCs are
built, five are funded, and eight are planned. He asked whether
he knew where the other NSCs will be homeported, and whether
there is a possibility any others may be stationed in Kodiak.
CAPTAIN PAGE said was unsure. He offered his belief that the
USCG will try to accommodate all the maritime interests in the
country. The Alaska's Congressional Delegation has been
influential and the USCG has been quite responsive to the needs
of Alaska; however, he was unsure.
2:56:19 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON, after first determining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HJR 13.
2:56:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN moved to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1, on
page 2, line 20, to include the President of United States,
[Barack Obama], and the [U.S.] Secretary of Homeland Security,
[Janet Napolitano], to the list of people to receive the
resolution. There being no objection, Conceptual Amendment 1
was adopted.
2:57:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ISAACSON moved to report HJR 13, as amended, out
of committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, the CSHJR
13(TRA) was reported from the House Transportation Standing
Committee.
2:57:52 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Transportation Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 2:57
p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB0176A.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 Sponsor Stmt ver A.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 FEDCO support letter.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 VWGoA memo.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HJR013A.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HJR 13 |
| HJR 13 Sponsor Statement Coast Guard Vessels.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HJR 13 |
| HJR 13 Support NSC fact sheet.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HJR 13 |
| HJR 13 support Arctic Shield 2012.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HJR 13 |
| HJR 13 support CGC Bertholf - Arctic Circle.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HJR 13 |
| HB 176 - CS version U.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB176-DOA-DMV-3-22-13.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 - CS version U.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HJR-13-TRA-3-22-13 Home Port Coast Guard Cutter.pdf |
HTRA 3/26/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HJR 13 |